Internet Cello Society Forums
   > Cello Chat
      > Solow - what's he mean?
   
<< Prev Topic  Next Topic >>
Author Subject
Laura Wichers
Registered User
(8/29/00 7:59:49 pm)
Reply
Solow - what's he mean?
"One of the things that [Piatigorsky's] approach led me to do was to have a flat hand on the bow, which is something that I have since changed, but it got me away from rotating my arm into the string." -from Solow's ICS interview

I've always been taught to rotate my 1st/2nd fingers into the stick to direct the weight of my arm/shoulder into the string for a good sound. I get the impression from Mr. Solow's comment that not all cellists play this way. So what way DO they play? Or am I misunderstanding the comment (I tried to take it as little out of context as possible)?


-Laura


Corrina Connor
Registered User
(8/30/00 12:20:20 am)
Reply
Re: Solow - what's he mean?
I was just discussing this rotation business with a cellist who does a lot of baroque playing, and has also been reading about Piatigorsky. When using a baroque bow it seems that one doesn't rotat. She and I did some experimentation, and we tried using our elbows (or rather the weight of them. (NOT by lifting our elbows). The concept seemed to work well, and removed any tenseness. We only needed the first/second fingers once we were nearly at the top third of the bow.

I now watch cellist's bow fingers a lot more, and it seems that some do use the 1st/2nd fingers much more than others.

Our tone improved a lot, and was bigger, and we were deeper into the string. Also, there was no pressure, just weight.

~Corrina~

BA
Registered User
(8/31/00 2:01:31 am)
Reply
Re: Solow - what's he mean?
I can't imagine that that is what Solow meant, as Piatigorsky's bow hand is almost as pronated as a violinists, and more so than most cellists. Check out the "Heifetz/Piatigorsky" videotape. Some amazing playing as well.

Tim Janof
Registered User
(9/5/00 11:26:39 am)
Reply
Here is Jeffrey Solow's reply to your question.
"There are two ways of getting force into the string through the first finger: active pronation and passive pronation. Active, as the name implies, uses muscles to rotate (pronate) the arm/bow into the string and produces pressure by means of torque. (One starts with the bow held vertically, rotates the forearm until the hair touched the string, and keeps rotating for more force.) Passive pronation comes from relaxing muscles and allowing the forearm to BECOME PRONATED through gravity--as if the forearm were a detached cylinder that starts to roll downhill toward the string. (One holds the bow horizontally above the string, lowers the arm/bow till the hair touches the string, and continues lowering it for more force.) Both of these transmit power to the bow primarily through the 1st finger. Laurence Lesser talked to me about transmitting force to the bow through the 2nd finger --which produces a much flatter hand position."

Edited by Tim Janof at: 9/5/00 11:26:39 am

Laura Wichers
Registered User
(9/5/00 8:43:00 pm)
Reply
Ahh. I get it. Thanks!


          New Solow - what's he mean?-Laura Wichers-(4)-8/29/00 7:59:49 pm  
               New Here is Jeffrey Solow's reply to your question.-Tim Janof 9/5/00 11:26:39 am  
                    New Ahh. I get it. Thanks!-Laura Wichers-NT 9/5/00 8:43:00 pm  
               New Re: Solow - what's he mean?-BA 8/31/00 2:01:31 am  
               New Re: Solow - what's he mean?-Corrina Connor 8/30/00 12:20:20 am  
<< Prev Topic  Next Topic >>

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image  Topic Commands (Moderator only)
Subscribe Click to receive email notification of replies

Jump to:

- Internet Cello Society Forums - Cello Chat - Internet Cello Society -


Powered By ezboard™ Ver. 5.7.2
© Copyright 1999, 2000
ezboard, Inc.