Internet Cello Society Forums
    > Cello Chat
        > montagana vs. strad
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author Comment
mycatmarti
Registered User
Posts: 64
(8/17/01 6:10:29 am)
Reply
montagana vs. strad
I already own one cello, which I dearly love.
At the end of next year I will be purchasing another cello, which I would like to be a Montagnana. I like the look of them.
Could you guys explain some of the differences between them besides size. I am strongly drawn to the Montagnana's but I want to know what to expect.
Such as where my Strad copy would play one way, how would the Montagnana differ.

Mia

justinkagan1 
Registered User
Posts: 420
(8/17/01 8:35:38 am)
Reply
Re: montagana vs. strad
By "look like" I assume you mean a copy, which in the case of Montagnana axes also provides the wrinkle of size...they're generally somewhat larger all around than all other instruments. This might take some adjusting to...many people are uncomfortable. Then there's the issue of a case for it...most standard cases are a tight squeeze for an oversize cello. As for the varnishing, most of the best luthiers make a habit of copying down to the nth detail if the buyer wants a real repro (don't count on it sounding like the original, however...there are too many reasons to enumerate here why modern makers are handicapped in this area, but wood quality is the biggie...the forests just ain't the same as they were 300 years ago). Arguably the best repros I've seen in recent years are by Samuel Zygmuntowicz in Brooklyn, whose Duport Strads (1711, owned by Rostropovich) are pretty amazing side by side with the original. But count on many extra $$$ for this faithfulness.

Edited by: justinkagan1  at: 8/18/01 8:56:30 am
mycatmarti
Registered User
Posts: 65
(8/17/01 8:56:50 am)
Reply
rephrase question
I own a not real expensive Strad Copy, and I'd like to buy a not real expensive Montagnana copy (around $5,500). (I'm a newspaper editor and can't afford more.) Besides look, what are the major differences between them.

Mia

samcn
Registered User
Posts: 16
(8/17/01 2:00:03 pm)
Reply
Strad VS Montagnana ( I mean copy)
HI,
After having my first Strad copy by Chinese Maker ( not well known) Mao-lin Sung, 1989, from a string exhibition show at Taipei -- I bought a Strad Copy by CC Lee around Dec, 2000 as a gift for myself..
Unfortunately, CC Lee came a little shy in front of the old Strad, so I traded for CC Lee Montagnana's model around July, 2001..
I can compare the both cellos made by same workshop..
Both came with Helicore strings.. A string was too sharp on Strad but much richer on Montagnana.. From the physics point of view -- smaller chamber can generate higher pitch and larger can produce lower pitch..
The formula is
sound speed (is fixed as around 330meter/second)=
frequency(pitch) x per wave length (depends on the intruments size)
So when you have a larger chamber as Montagnana, you will experience the lower frequency is "more obvious" even in the same pitch.. Because when we hear A note at 440 as base tone.. There are 880, 220, 110, 55 Hz in that "sound"
That's the beauty of "rich sound" in bow string instruments becase the combination of different pitches together from the instruments( that's why they have curve shape, hand carved to create uneven surface to produce thousands of different vibration), strings, bow to temperature..
So, Montagnana tends to have richer in lower key, even to higher note.. But larger instrument will also absorb/delay the sound as Strad is easier to project as described "open, powerful"
I love both cellos.. Now I use Helicore on Montagnana and Obligato on old Strad.. So far I enjoy them so much, I have to double my practice time to be fareto them!!
I have few pictures of them ( for insurance purpose) if you are interested..
Sam
samcn@yahoo.com

Steve Drake
Registered User
Posts: 432
(8/18/01 9:58:16 pm)
Reply
Community Supporter
Re: montagana vs. strad
There are two main physical differences. The mont's have bigger shoulders, and hence you need to move your left elbow up a bit sooner as you move into the higher positions. Not much, and this is quickly learned. The mont's also have smaller side cutouts, which can be an issue depending on which model of montagnana is being copied - some of these cutouts are very small. On one of my cellos it took a while to figure out how to place my bow while playing on the A string, because I kept hitting the corners.

Tonewise you'll probably enjoy the mont's - I do. They're generally fatter sounding, and can have amazing low notes. Both of mine have really fat sounding A strings in the higher registers, which is a lot of fun for solo work.

The string length and where the neck corner is should be the same as most cellos - check this out on any prospective cellos. The size difference is all in the width, which is variable, as Montagnana made several different sizes, and his models are often modified by the copiers.

My MP3's
My Cello Homepage

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Replies
montagana vs. strad mycatmarti 8/17/01 6:10:29 am
    Re: montagana vs. strad Steve Drake 8/18/01 9:58:16 pm
    Strad VS Montagnana ( I mean copy) samcn 8/17/01 2:00:03 pm
    rephrase question mycatmarti 8/17/01 8:56:50 am
    Re: montagana vs. strad justinkagan1  8/17/01 8:35:38 am



Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands (Moderator only)
Subscribe Click to receive email notification of replies
jump to:

- Internet Cello Society Forums - Cello Chat - Internet Cello Society -



Powered By ezboard® Ver. 6.3.5
Copyright ©1999-2001 ezboard, Inc.