Internet Cello Society Forums
    > Instruments and Equipment
        > Front and Back construction
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author Comment
Bobbie
Registered User
Posts: 585
(8/15/01 10:07:59 pm)
Reply
Front and Back construction
What are the advantages/disadvantages of two-piece cello backs? What about two-piece fronts?

drcello
Registered User
Posts: 574
(8/16/01 6:48:53 am)
Reply | Edit
Not important
There are plenty of good cellos in which both front or back are made of two joined pieces. More importantly, don't get a cello made of stamped out, or pressed out plywood. Both front and back should be "fully carved" from solid wood boards, joined or not.

Also, the two piece back is almost mandatory because of the beautiful effect of the maple flames mirroring each other. I think the advantage is visual, not auditory.

Marshall C. St. John
drcello@vei.net
Wayside Presbyterian Church

DWThomas
Registered User
Posts: 389
(8/16/01 7:10:04 am)
Reply
Re: Front and Back construction
A big difference would be cost. Especially in tops, fairly close-grained, quarter-sawn spruce is usually an ideal. To get that in one piece you'd need a tree with a diameter more than twice the width of a cello -- not too common these days.

I suspect the acoustic effects are nil. Harpsichord soundboards are typically glued up from strips of spruce two to four inches wide. Various makers report differences in sound are more due to design than the wood species or quantity and direction of pieces used.

I agree with DrCello that making the back in two pieces allows book-matching the grain for a nice symmetrical pattern.

Properly made glue joints are typically stronger than the wood, so that's pretty much a non-issue.

Dave

Bobbie
Registered User
Posts: 587
(8/16/01 9:07:35 am)
Reply
Thanks
I had read that two-piece backs might even be stronger but couldn't find anything on fronts. I guess with the front the question might be mainly cosmetic- i.e., if it looks good, it's fine?

Br Martin
Registered User
Posts: 35
(8/27/01 4:23:25 pm)
Reply
2 pieces
Two piece tops and backs are stronger if they're not cut way too thin. I've only seen one 1 piece top cello in 25+ years making and repairing, and not many one piece backs, and those were slab cut.

Christopher Chan
Registered User
Posts: 169
(8/27/01 9:30:26 pm)
Reply
why stop at 1 or 2 pieces?
If i remember correctly the De Munck Strad which Isserlis uses now has a 3 piece spruce top. It also wasn't made of the choicest wood.

I've played a few of one piece backed cellos mostly new, but some old which had poplar or willow backs. I don't think i've played a cello with a one piece top. I know Nathan Slobodkin in ME and Grugaugh and Seifert in CA make instruments with one piece backs. The backs of the cellos usually have knots and imperfections in the wood, but it really gives them a lot of character, they also sounded great if you like a big and full dark timbre.

Todd French 
Moderator
Posts: 246
(8/28/01 1:16:46 am)
Reply
Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces?
There are quite a few modern American makers using 4-piece tops to get the best spruce. The added two pieces happen to be in the lower bout only. I've also seen 4-piece backs on some instruments, with the added 'wings' on the lower bout once again.

Christopher Chan
Registered User
Posts: 170
(8/28/01 7:33:16 am)
Reply
Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces?
That's cool todd i didn't know that. I'll have to keep my eye's open next time for 4 piecers.

rubycello
Registered User
Posts: 16
(8/28/01 12:40:06 pm)
Reply
4 piece backs
I was playing today on a Scottish cello with a 3-piece back. Again as Todd says the 'extra' 2 pieces were in the lower bouts.

Todd French 
Moderator
Posts: 247
(8/28/01 1:22:44 pm)
Reply
Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces?
Christopher,

Actually, I saw a photo of a Moes and Moes cello (American husband and wife makers) with a 4-piece top about 2 years ago or something. I have no idea where I saw it, or how I could find it for you, but if you have a chance to see a Moes instrument, I understand they often use extra wood for the bottom bout.

CelloBass
Registered User
Posts: 74
(8/28/01 5:08:44 pm)
Reply
Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces?
Todd,

there are also old and expensive double basses with 6- or 8-piece tops and backs. Obviously the quality of the wood is more important than the number of pieces.

Horst

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Replies
Front and Back construction Bobbie 8/15/01 10:07:59 pm
    4 piece backs rubycello 8/28/01 12:40:06 pm
    why stop at 1 or 2 pieces? Christopher Chan 8/27/01 9:30:26 pm
       Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces? Todd French  8/28/01 1:16:46 am
          Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces? Christopher Chan 8/28/01 7:33:16 am
             Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces? Todd French  8/28/01 1:22:44 pm
                Re: why stop at 1 or 2 pieces? CelloBass 8/28/01 5:08:44 pm
    2 pieces Br Martin 8/27/01 4:23:25 pm
    Thanks Bobbie 8/16/01 9:07:35 am
    Re: Front and Back construction DWThomas 8/16/01 7:10:04 am
    Not important drcello 8/16/01 6:48:53 am



Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands (Moderator only)
Subscribe Click to receive email notification of replies
jump to:

- Internet Cello Society Forums - Instruments and Equipment - Internet Cello Society -



Powered By ezboard® Ver. 6.3.5
Copyright ©1999-2001 ezboard, Inc.