Internet Cello Society Forums
    > Instruments and Equipment
        > Changes to Bridge, Soundpost & Strings
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author Comment
sbwaters
Registered User
Posts: 5
(7/18/01 9:16:06 am)
Reply
Changes to Bridge, Soundpost & Strings
Hi,

I enjoy and am very comfortable with the physical aspects of my newly rented-with-option-to-buy (about $2,000) Gliga cello (Larson A & D, Spirocore Tungsten G & C strings). I love the look of it.

As my experience develops, I'm thinking that the sound seems muted, particularly in the overtones of the lower strings. (It also seems to have a wolf when I play an E on the G string.)

Checking out other cellos, I took my rental to a luthier who said the soundpost was too short and the center opening in the bridge was not well-placed.

Please help me understand the consequences of changing the bridge, the soundpost, and, perhaps the strings.

Thanks for your insight and experience.

regards/sbw

Bob
Registered User
Posts: 274
(7/19/01 7:20:19 am)
Reply
Re: Changes to Bridge, Soundpost & Strings
Two VERY important things to always keep in mind when you take a potential instrument to another dealer for evaluation: (1) Instrument set-up is a subjective matter. There is no gold standard that every luthier agrees with. If you compare the same instrument as set up by Moennig, Archieri, Francais, and Weaver, they'll all have differently-shaped bridges, heights, soundpost settings, etc. It's a matter of one's experience & preference, no one agrees on these matters. (2) A luthier views every person who walks in the door of the shop with someone else's instrument as a potential customer. His evaluation of the instrument can go a long way towards making that customer reconsider his choice and go with what the luthier has to offer instead.

Andrew Victor
Registered User
Posts: 358
(7/19/01 8:21:53 am)
Reply
Look at tailpiece and endpin too! and the bow too!
I'm sure Bob is correct in his view of shops and dealers.

I count on a dealer/luthier treating me as if he views me as a potential customer for bigger things - and indeed even if I have not bought anything strospherically priced, I've accompanied some other customers who have.

However, the condition of your cello can depend on who set it up, how experienced they are, and how much attention they gave to the process (and whether anything has slipped since then). I long prided my ability to adjust a soundpost (to find the sweet spot) until I watched a top professional do it. He could (and did) cover as many positions (in optimizing placement) in a minute or so as I could in an hour.

I've had one shop (Ifshin, in Berkeley, CA) set up all 10 of my instruments (violins, violas and cellos) in the last 18 months or so, and in every case they came out better than they went in - sometimes much, much better. I feel I was treated fairly, some instruments got new bridges and soundposts, others just got adjustments - I left it up to them.

I have found the Larsen/Spirocore combination you are using quite good on a number of cellos. Some cellos are too powerful in the lower register to handle the tungsten strings - and the silver ones do better, but such a cello should not seem muted with tungsten. I've tried other strings - Obligatos and Belcanto Golds and found that while they have some advantages, it is quite cello dependent, and I would likely stay with what you have. The Obligato A and D, might brighten up the top end, but I have found the G and C difficult to work with. The Belcanto Golds are nice and responsive, probably more so than anything else, and have a nice brightness, but I think the sound is a little softer than your combination. It just might be easier to use the bow in more ways on Belcanto Golds - but that could depend on your bow too.

In fact, you might just try a few more expensive bows. I tried a $50 brazilwood bow and a $1,500 pernambuco bow on a (less than) $1,000 cello at Scott Cao's shop in San Jose. The cello seemed pretty unacceptable with the cheap bow, but showed a lot of good qualities (especially for its price) with the good bow.

A lot of us are now finding that in addition to optimized conventional setup of strings, bridge, and soundpost, the new tailpieces with built-in tuners and substituting one of David Bice's (New Harmony Music) graphite/epoxy endpins can really open up a cello's sound. The added weight of four-steel fine tuners on the tailpiece can really dampen the tone of some cellos.

Although I have found the most expensive (Bois e'Harmonie) tailpieces to be the best, I've gotten significant improvements with the much less expensive Wittner aluminum tailpiece or the composite Ferwerda (from Australia). A lot of people find the composite Akusticus to be acceptable. These days, you will see these new-fangled tailpieces even on professional's cellos (even some world-class soloists).

There are other new-concept tailpieces than Bice's available as well, but his has the advantage that it can slip right into a conventional (8 mm) endpin fitting, although he also makes a stiffer 10-mm one. (And, I think his sound better.) If your endpin slips right out, you could substitute one of these, if not, the fitting would have to be removed from the cello so the endpin can be removed, and then one of Bice's could be substituted. The only real danger in removing the endpin fitting yourself is that in loosening all the strings the soundpost might fall down. You might also not get the bridge back on in the right place (or the "right way").And you have to protect the top of the cello from being scratched with the old fine tuners touch it (a protective newspaper or cloth will do).

Andy

Edited by: Andrew Victor at: 7/20/01 8:46:51 am
sbwaters
Registered User
Posts: 6
(7/19/01 10:00:49 am)
Reply
Re: I learn every time I visit these forums
Thank you all for your time and effort responding. I learn more every time I visit these forums.

regards/sbw

BTW, I'm using a Knoll octagonal bow I purchased when I needed to get beyond the student bow that came with my first Engelhardt rental. (It cost about $250). On that cello I tried six different wood and graphite bows in the $250-$500 range. I like both the look and the feel of this one. (I'm using Bernadel Rosin). I'd hate to have it be the bow, but I'll try others.

Edited by: sbwaters at: 7/19/01 10:13:58 am
<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Replies
Changes to Bridge, Soundpost & Strings sbwaters 7/18/01 9:16:06 am
    Look at tailpiece and endpin too! and the bow too! Andrew Victor 7/19/01 8:21:53 am
       Re: I learn every time I visit these forums sbwaters 7/19/01 10:00:49 am
    Re: Changes to Bridge, Soundpost & Strings Bob 7/19/01 7:20:19 am



Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands (Moderator only)
Subscribe Click to receive email notification of replies
jump to:

- Internet Cello Society Forums - Instruments and Equipment - Internet Cello Society -



Powered By ezboard® Ver. 6.3 b4
Copyright ©1999-2001 ezboard, Inc.