Seattle Violoncello Society Newsletter, January 1995 (c)Seattle Violoncello Society


Happy New Year!

Now that the holiday season is over, we can again turn our attention to cello society business. For the remainder of this season, we will be sponsoring the Annual Bach Cello Suite Marathon on March 25 and we hope to sponsor a master class or lecture with Janos Starker around May 1, if his schedule permits.

By the way, I have moved. Please send all correspondence and renewals to:

Seattle Violoncello Society

c/o Tim Finholt

15407 NE 1st St.

Bellevue, WA 98007

Phone (206) 865-8045

Tim Finholt

In this issue:

Letters: Reviews of Lynn Harrell's Haydn C performance

The Soloist: A Review

"That Room at the Top," by Janos Starker


Cello News

1. Annual Bach Cello Suite Marathon

On March 25, from 10am-3pm, the Seattle Violoncello Society is sponsoring the Annual Bach Cello Suite Marathon. It will be held in the Church at 6556 35th Street NE in Seattle. All cellists are welcome to perform. To sign up for a movement, please call Cordelia Wikarski-Miedel at 365-5331.

2. David Tonkonogui Recital!

On Sunday, January 8, at 2pm the Bridge Ensemble's David Tonkonogui and Karen Sigers perform in a cello recital. They will perform Bach's C Major Suite with a piano accompaniment composed by Schumann, the Schnittke Sonata, and Brahms e minor Sonata. It should be a GREAT concert. For tickets call 329-5853.

3. Yo-Yo Ma and Pamela Frank recital

Yo-Yo Ma and Pamela Frank perform together in the Meany Theater on February 24.

4. The Manhattan School of Music scores

Nathaniel Rosen and David Soyer have joined the faculty of the Manhattan School of Music.

5. Cello Ensemble Play-in

Due to lack of interest, our attempt at organizing a cello-ensemble sight-reading event last October was cancelled.

6. Cello Music Collection Established

The Florence Reynolds Collection at the University of Montana in Missoula has been created. It includes music for cello ensembles of various sizes as well as solo repertoire. For more information, contact Fern Glass Boyd, Department of Music, University of MT 59812.

7. The Piatigorsky Seminar

Zara Nelsova, Seigfried Palm, and Harvey Shapiro will join Seminar Director Eleonore Schoenfeld next summer, June 10-June 17, at the University of Southern California's Piatigorsky Seminar for Cellists.

Participants are selected upon application and successful audition, and must not have a birthdate prior to June 10, 1969. For information and an application form, telephone (213) 740-3103, or write to Professor Schoenfeld at the School of Music, USC, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0851. The application deadline is February 1.

Applicants are expected to play very difficult repertoire on the level of the Haydn D Major Concerto or Brahms F Major Sonata.

8. The red dot means we've asked 3 times

If you have a red dot on your envelope, this is your last newsletter. If you think we are in error, or your financial situation prevents you from paying, please let us know.

Cello Literature

1. Mstislav Rostropovich and Galina Vishnevskaya: Russia, Music, and Liberty. Conversations with Claude Samuel, by Claude Samuel ( # 0-931340-76-4)

"This book is a vivid portrait of two great musicians whose lives have been both a fairy-tale love story and front-page history. In these conversations with French journalist and critic Claude Samuel, Rostropovich and Vishnevskaya tell their dramatic story from their 1955 marriage (four days after meeting!) onward. Musical matters -- Bach, Beethoven, and the great Russian masters -- lie at the focus of their thoughts, but their turbulent political battles coupled with a deep love for their homeland are pervasive themes as well. These conversations, first published in 1983, are here translated for the first time, with a new preface by Claude Samuel."

(The above description was copied from the catalog.)

To order, write to:

Amadeus Press

The Haseltine Building

133 SW Second Avenue, Suite 450

Portland, OR 97204

or call 1-800-327-5680. The book is hardback and costs $24.95 + $4.95 (shipping) = $29.90.

The Muse Speaks to Virginia Katims

I got to thinking the other day about how many times I have played 2nd Cello in the Schubert C Major Quintet and the Brahms Sextets. Some of these were benefit concerts for the Seattle Symphony. So I wrote the following:


My fate in life, it sometimes seems,

Is playing second 'cello.

I could play first, I really could,

My tone is strong but mellow.


But if a note is slightly sharp,

Or some soft phrase should bellow,

My colleagues often look askance

And blame the second 'cello!


The second 'cello, you will hear,

Is often "in the basement"--

While others soar in the Stratosphere

I suffer from effacement.


But oh, my foes, and ah, my friends,

On this we all agree--

Without a firm "foundation"

What a rocky world t'would be!


And in a group -- a super group,

My place I will not barter

I'll sing-along, I'll play their song,

Like Avis--I'll try harder!

Let's see...I've played these "tunes" with the Budapest Quartet, with Isaac Stern and Leonard Rose -- twice -- with the Philadelphia Quartet, with artist faculty at the University of Houston, 3 times, etc.

Virginia Katims

Did you know...

1. Mendelssohn wrote a cello concerto for the legendary cellist, Piatti? When the composer was finished, he dedicated it to Piatti and sent it to him. But it never reached its destination. It was lost in the mail!

2. Beethoven offered to compose a cello concerto for another famous cellist, Romberg. But Romberg told him that he would never study it and that he never played anything but his own compositions. So no Beethoven Cello Concerto was written.

Further demonstrating Romberg's sensitivity, he once told the great violinist Ludwig Spohr that he was astonished that Spohr could bring himself to play "something as absurd" as the Opus 18 Beethoven Quartets. Romberg also called the Opus 59 "Rasumovsky" Quartet an "infamous hoax."

(from Dimitry Markevitch, Cello Story. Summy-Birchard Music, Princeton, 1984.)

Technical Tip

"Practice a fast passage faster than it is to be performed, so that it feels comfortable at the required speed. Practice a long bow more slowly than required; then one will not run out of bow length at the desire bow speed."

(from Ida Roettinger, Ph.D., Head, Hand, Heart. Cushing-Mally, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1994.)


The following letters do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Seattle Violoncello Society. They represent the opinions of individual members.

What did I think of Lynn Harrell's performance of the Haydn C Major Cello Concerto last March with the Seattle Symphony? He had several humorous and anecdotal references in the cadenza of the first movement, which many audience members found to be entertaining and amusing.

Granted, classical music needs to be presented in an accessible way to many people who find it off-putting. But I do not think this was the appropriate place or time. It seemed though that the audience thoroughly enjoyed what Lynn Harrell was doing. Shouldn't a great artist like Lynn Harrell be allowed some freedom to perform in a different, even glib manner if the audience loves it? Probably so. Was it appropriate? Maybe not.

I'm not going so far as to say that I thought the performance was offensive or that he was irresponsible. I would prefer to think that this was a creative experiment that he won't try again.


Lynn Harrell is too great an artist to need to appeal to the lowest common denominator of the audience. I pray that someday he will focus on the music instead the applause..

John Veska

Suggested Topic for Future Letters

In the article, "That Room at the Top," by Janos Starker, do you agree with his statement that "in a sense, only Nemo is qualified to judge Nemo?" See page 6, second column.



by Mark Salzman

(Random House, Inc., 1993)

The Soloist, Mark Salzman's (author of Iron and Silk) latest book, delves into the life of fictional cellist Renne Sundheimer, incredible child prodigy and musical genius. The novel (284 short pages) deals with Renne, 34 year old "failed" concert artist and now cello teacher in a large university in Southern California, and how two events change his outlook. He begins to teach a gifted child prodigy, a nine year old Korean boy who reminds him of his own lost potential. He also unwillingly becomes a juror on a murder trial for the killing of a Buddhist monk.

As both events unfold, Renne also begins to tell us about his early brilliant performing career. His abusive stage mother hinders his relationships with others, especially women. Renne describes how his perfectionist personality develops to the point that he is no longer able to tolerate his own cello playing, and is forced to stop his playing career. His old cello teacher inspires Renne to develop his own cello technique and music philosophy. He begins to relate all of this through the events of the trial and the lessons of his Korean student to forge an integrated outlook of his playing and teaching career.

Mark Salzman is also a cellist, and has written a believable account of the trials of a concert cellist. He is obviously familiar with the technical and musical information of a string instrument, which should be much appreciated by cellists. He also presents musical information in an accessible way to uninformed readers.

I found The Soloist to be a good plane read. It took about 3 hours to read, most of which I did on a plane from Pittsburgh to Seattle on US Air, rum and coke in hand, to avoid thinking about turbulence. I appreciated being pleasantly distracted from most thoughts concerning airplane crashes. However, nothing much really happens plot-wise, and it is hard for me to believe that a profound change occurs in Renne.

Still, it is interesting and entertaining to read a novel (or perhaps novella) about this subject. I'd recommend buying the paperback to read for a 3 hour stretch. It might

be a good idea to keep it in the glove compartment for traffic jams.

Lauren Daugherty

That Room at the Top

by Janos Starker

The following article originally appeared in the December 1962 issue of "Mademoiselle."

Not long ago I told a famous musician and his manager a joke that I had recently heard. It was received with a short silence that ended in forced laughter. This is the story: Do you know the history of an international concert star in six brief acts? No? Well, Nemo is a great violinist, Blunt is a manager. Blunt Speaks:

Act I. Nemo? Who's he?

Act II: Nemo? Oh, yes. He's good of course, but you know how difficult it is.

Act III: I must have Nemo. I don't care how, but I must have him.

Act IV: You know, I must have someone like Nemo.

Act V: I must have someone like Nemo when he was young.

Act VI: Nemo? Who's he?

Not a particularly funny joke, perhaps, and especially unfunny to someone who, like my distinguished friend, is in the middle of Act III. But does it say something uncomfortably true? Nothing is as pat as all that, but this brief history does afford a rough perspective of what artists go through, women as well as men, though few ever get beyond Act II. What I myself have to say about the subject can hardly lift the veil of mystery from the face of success; it is mere educated guesswork. But perhaps that is the best anyone can offer.

Before the curtain rises on Act I of the great performer's history, there has been a long, arduous preparation; for even to be on the verge of a concert career is a triumph of talent and dedicated hard work. Nobody ever asks a manager if he has heard of someone named Nemo unless he believes that the young unknown is a potential concert artist.

To have this potential means that young Nemo has put in years of practice, beginning from about the age of six. His father probably loved the fiddle and wanted his son to be the great concert artist he never had a chance to be. Luckily the son had real gifts to begin with. After school he went home for a music lesson or to practice while the other boys played baseball. After high school he entered a conservatory, immersing himself deeper and deeper in the technique and literature of his instrument, practicing six to eight hours a day. He received pedagogical encouragement and has played at recitals for young performers. Perhaps he has garnered a medal or two from competitions. But what matters most is something without which all his talent, training, and experience amount to no more than the equipment of a music teacher; an obstinate, obsessive determination to be great.

His next step is a debut. If he has already won a competition, there is a good chance that he may have been given one. If not, the first manager he is introduced to will suggest that he have a debut, and Act I of the history is underway. New York is the best place to make a debut, though to fail there is to have failed at the top. From a New York failure he can go nowhere, except perhaps Europe, from which artists do sometimes return to make the grade at home.

The greatest obstacle to the debut is its cost. When Nemo makes the grade, he will be paid handsomely for the concerts he plays; but in the beginning it is likely to be he who foots the bills -- or his friends and relatives.

Nemo tries to work up an interesting program, preferably including something little-known and something he has played well before. He goes on stage before an audience of the people who have invested in him, plus a few strangers who have managed to get free tickets, and perhaps even a second-string critic or two, if there are no major musical events scheduled for the same evening.

The aftermath is far less predictable than the concert itself. Even though there may be warm applause and a cheerful party afterward, if this performance hasn't quite measured up to critical standards, this moment of his life may be memorialized by a mere line or two in the newspapers and a small mountain of debts. At this point the no-longer-so-potential concert artist must decide either to get a job with a musical group and try again in a few years, or to give up his precarious hopes of concertizing and go into teaching or some other musical field not involving solo performances, such as managing other musicians or working on the staff of a record company. The hard realities of earning a living leaves little time or energy for making a second attempt. And so the history often ends with Act I, Scene 1. But if the debut has been a fair success in the eyes of managers and critics, Act I will proceed apace.

A contract is the next step, and at this point it seems to Nemo that the way to the top is now smooth and sure. But the manager, Mr. Blunt, who offers it, puts it dryly enough: "Let's hope this will be mutually beneficial. We'll do our best. We want our percentage, after all." (The manager's percentage is normally 20 percent for recitals, 10 percent for television and radio appearances.) In any case, from now on Blunt is in charge.

The Blunts -- of whom a surprising number are women -- have a difficult job. They must engage and sell artists to audiences who may never have known that they wanted to hear a violinist, much less a cellist or an oboist. To do their job well managers need neither know nor like music. However, managers who care about music do much to raise musical standards by sending first-rate artists into communities where there has never been much demand for excellence. There are managers who care so little about the music itself that they may arrange engagements by checking the ethnic make-up of a community in order to determine whether a Pole or an Italian will go down better.

Not only do the attitudes of a managers vary enormously, so do their activities. A manager may have under exclusive contract a small list of artists whom he sells to orchestras, local concert managers (who sponsor a concert series in their city), colleges, and universities. He may be the representative of a particular orchestra who buys artists to play with it. He may be one of a dozen managers in a large agency, each representing several artists, having behind him the resources of a powerful company to help in promoting clients. Blunt's problem with his new client Nemo, then, is to sell him to somebody, and he is going to have quite a job. However, every town has its small but sufficiently influential group of dedicated music lovers who can exert enough pressure to bring concert series to their local halls and auditoriums. Who are they? Committee women, the board of directors of the local orchestra, conductors, managers. These interested people are constantly listening, reading newspapers, following new recordings, talking shop with friends, making plans for future seasons.

Small as Nemo's chances seem at the outset, all this curiosity and appetite for new talent favors him. He also has on his side the tendency of musicians to be generous about plugging one another. Experienced artists are constantly solicited for their opinions and are glad to suggest promising younger or lesser-known players -- even people who play the same instruments -- because it all helps the cause of good music, and ultimately their own careers. The judgment of a colleague is valued for its objectivity; such promotion is probably the strongest factor in making possible the transition from Act I to Act II. Before the world at large can recognize Nemo's quality, his peers must do so.

In planning a season, what a local manager needs above all is three or four stars, for a season can be hung on them, with the rank and file filling the gaps between. A famous name costs far more than an excellent unknown, but without stars it is impossible to secure the steady subscription audience necessary for any concert series.

But how does Nemo get to be a star? While he is still in Act I, simmering with unrecognized promise, the wheels start turning. An out-of-town orchestra is planning its next season and wants as many stars as possible. Perhaps two are in the bag. The third is "unavailable." Someone murmurs the name of Nemo -- "a young violinist I heard the other day. Sounds just like so-and-so years ago." Here Blunt may come into the picture, too. He is handling Star No. 1, whom the planning committee has been counting on, and suggests that he may present a little difficulty. In his next breath he happens to mention his brilliant young client, Nemo. It is clear to the committee that to include Nemo in the next season is a form of insurance. So he is engaged. This kind of thing happens again and again. Nemo is not quite sought out, but he is taken on. After it has happened a few hundred times, Act II has begun.

In one scene of Act II the bravos are loud but the reviews bad; in another, good reviews, but a tepid reception -- though Nemo is convinced that his performances are basically the same. His colleagues argue over his interpretation of this, criticize his handling of that, but generally agree that he's on his way up. In spite of this, his fees remain low (in Act I he may have been paid from one hundred fifty to five hundred dollars a concert; in Act II the fees rise to something between five hundred and fifteen hundred dollars, depending on how long he has been around and how seasoned a concert artist he is), while his expenses -- accompanist, manager, publicity, travel -- are tremendous. After all the expenses of the season are paid, the musician is left with about 30 percent of the total take; though pianists, who do without accompanists, get as much as half. So although a top star with high fees can get by on as few as twenty to thirty concerts a year, others may play two or three a week to make ends meet and they must supplement these earnings by teaching or by playing first chair in a symphony orchestra.

Years pass. It goes on as before -- an exhausting shuttle from city to city, country to country, practicing in hotel rooms; in some place a star, in others, a perpetual debutant. Nevertheless, Nemo is good and getting better. His private life is haphazard, but as an artist he is now one of the select few, and Act III is at hand ("I must have Nemo, I don't care how").

How is this? What is he doing that makes him succeed while others who play equally as well remain forever in Act II? Every star of the musical scene -- the players in Act II -- must have certain accomplishments: an exceptional ear, excellent fingers, perfect coordination physically and mentally, a first-rate memory, a studious mind, curiosity, diligence, the ability and willpower to work with total concentration. He has, of course, spent years and years practicing; he has studied everything of musical importance: other instruments, composition, the history of music.

What more has Nemo, who finally becomes an international concert star? It's difficult to say. He plays faultlessly, of course, but in addition has imagination and a sense of color. He strives for construction and balance in a musical work. His tone has warmth and beauty. He sets a high standard for himself and often plays above it, never below. But it isn't this either. Other artists of the first magnitude who never quite emerge from Act II have these qualities and never become true international stars. Yet without them the world of music would be nothing. They are the carriers of tradition; they create and sustain standards; they provide the climate in which the handful of immortals may have their being.

But what, then, does make the difference? The great star has personality, a charismatic presence, whether or not everyone likes it. He is nervous before concerts, but once on stage he feels completely at ease. The audience believes in him and watches him lovingly, noting his expressions, his gestures.

Not only that; he is absolutely steady. He must have definite ideas about the course his career is to follow, step by step; and along this seemingly endless plateau he moves unhesitatingly. He refuses to be exhausted or put down by the sheer dreary grind. If he suffers a setback -- gets an occasional bad notice, or finds that a conductor doesn't like him, or that his instrument is not popular everywhere -- he shakes it off quickly. Bad luck only makes him work harder.

This determination provides him with an air of authority, and perhaps it is in this aura that the ultimate secret of his stardom lies. Opinions of his playing may differ; one critic will say his tempi are too rapid, another the reverse. Some will consider his left hand fabulous, his right so-so. Some say his Bach is superb; others that he is the finest exponent of the romantics. But that he is it they agree.

(Qualities of personality occasionally carry an artist into the third act of his musical career even though he lacks a few of the basic prerequisites of technique, musicality, and intelligence. A well-mixed combination of aura, politics, press-agentry, connections, and showmanship can make a star. But the act will be brief, and it will be the last act. Nobody will ever say afterward: "I must have someone like Nemo.")

Because Nemo is the star of our six-act history of a great musical artist, we must assume he has a happy balance of all the qualities essential to true greatness. As time goes on, he finds that more offers than he can possibly accept come from all over the world. His movements have to be planned years in advance. Managerial letters have changed their tone: they offer baits: Nemo exercises his prerogative to cancel, alter, choose at will. His consent to play somewhere stirs up excitement.

But time passes, the air mileage rolls into the hundreds of thousands, and Nemo is growing tired. Taxes are so high that he decides to play less and for much higher fees. Fewer budgets can afford him. He spends more time making records and collecting royalties than playing concerts. His name is legend. He and his playing represent a school -- the Nemo sound, the Nemo approach. Criticism can no longer hurt him. He is the measure of all things and, in a sense, only Nemo is qualified to judge Nemo. His basic artistic goals and ideals may be incomprehensible to most of his admirers, but it doesn't matter. He is one of a half dozen instrumentalists in the world who can fill any concert hall.

And so Nemo and his peers, a handful out of a whole generation of musicians, pass on into Act IV (I must have someone like Nemo"). The managers begin to look for artists who can substitute for the great international star, since he can't begin to satisfy the demand for his concerts. A new elite is rising, new Blunt's take charge of them. Nemo's authority is unchallenged, but his physical abilities and musical discipline have begun to show signs of attrition. For awhile he is forgiven small falterings and blurrings, since all the magnificence of his artistic concept is still present. But the young have discovered concepts of their own, standards of their own, Nemo's of their own. Someone as good as Nemo was when he was young finally appears, and for Nemo himself the penultimate act begins--"I must have someone like Nemo used to be when he was young."

Years later, the last act of all is played. An old conductor and a young Blunt are discussing violinists and their varying interpretations of standard violin repertory. The conductor reflects on the different tempi he has heard used in the scherzo of the "Kreutzer" Sonata. He sighs and his face lights up: "Nemo -- no one ever played that movement as he did." The young Blunt frowns and says, "Nemo? Who's he?"


January 8 David Tonkonogui and Karen Sigers perform in a cello recital at the Seattle Art Museum at 2pm. 329-5853.

January 22 Page Smith and Duane Hulbert perform Bridge Sonata for Cello and Piano. 343-0445.

February 24 Yo-Yo Ma and Pamela Frank appear in recital at Meany Theatre. 543-4880.

April 3,4 Daniel Gaisford performs the Elgar Cello Concerto with the Seattle Symphony. 443-4747

May 1,2 Janos Starker performs the Dvorak Cello Concerto with the Seattle Symphony. 443- 4747.

Send comments on the content of this server to John Michel at
Editors: Paul Critser, Bret Smith & Carrie Rehkopf
Technical Consultant: Josh Childers
Copyright © 1995 Internet Cello Society